TED Talk by Suzanne Lee
1. From this video I've taken away the amazing concept of growing clothes. From a simple combination of tea, sugar, microbes and heat, a material can be formed that can be shaped into clothing. As the ingredients ferment together, they form into layers that turn into a mat. Once the mat is at a desired thickness, it can be dried into a fabric-like material! It can be easily colored, shaped, and made into clothing. A few perks about these new kinds of clothing are that they are completely "home-grown", they are colored with organic colors (like fruit and vegetable colors or indigo), are biodegrateable, and are a new, green option for clothing. Also, this material that Suzanne has discovered can hopefully be used later for medical purposes, such as synthetic blood vessels or replacement bone tissue. This discovery not only opens up a whole new line of environmentally-friendly clothing, but can also be used to change or even save lives. Simple discoveries like this one and wonderful because it proves that every little thing counts, and every little thing can make a difference.
2. The speaker had an interesting way of talking. She talked very quickly and very straightforward. She did not ask the audience questions or try to connect to them in any way. She spoke clearly and directly, but did not have any sort of connection with her audience.
3. Her presentation style was very informative and detatched. She gave tons of information, included the process in which she grows her clothing, and showed lots of pictures and examples. But at the same time there was no heart-touching or inspiring aspect in her presentation. It was a flat out, fact filled formal presentation with a very small amount of personalization.
4. This concept matters because it is a new, greener way to produce things that everyone wants. It also opens a whole new door for medicine and the replacement of things like blood vessels and bone tissue. This connects to me personally because, being a teenager, I am quite caught up in fashion. With new organic, biodegrateable, simple fashions out there, the teen culture may explode over it. Also, this idea effects education because it can change the way medicial students research the replacement of certain organs in the body. This effects the world because it brings forward a new kind of clothing, that many women, I'm sure, will enjoy very much, and it also brings a new factor to the medicial table and the fight to create blood vessels and bone tissue to use to save human lives.
Maria's Ted Talk
Wednesday, May 4, 2011
Monday, May 2, 2011
TED Talk Response #7
TED Talk by Mick Ebeling
1. From this video I have taken away the inspiring idea that paralyzed people can finally have a way to communicate with others. Instead of having to spend huge amounts of money on Stephan Hawking's machine that allows paralyzed people to communicate, a group of 'computer geeks' from all over the world have come together to create a device for their friend, Tony, who was paralyzed. This friend is a big-time graffiti artist in the 80's who experienced ALS and is now completely paralyzed except for his eyes, and has been this way for 7 years, stuck in his mind without a body that functions correctly. Mick and his buddies knew Tony was being tortured by not being able to create art. Mick talked to the family of the paralyzed artist, and even though he had no idea how he was going to do it, he was motivated enough to tell Tony's family he would find away for him to communicate and do his art again. Then, after tons of reasearch, collaboration, and hard-work came along the invention that unlocked a locked in artist. A simple pair of sunglasses with LED lights, wires, and a camera from a PS3 turned into an invention that finally allowed paralyzed people to communicate and draw with movements of their eyes. The device was taken to Tony and he drew for the first time, and later sent an email that said he felt like he had been pulled out from underwater because of the EyeWriter. If you see something that is impossible, make it possible.
2. The speaker was very effective in his speaking techniques. He spoke clearly and directly to the audience and quickly got them hooked in his presentation. He told a story around his slides and spoke smoothly. He kept all his ideas together and used hand movements to clarify each of the inspiring ideas he vocalized.
3. Mick's presentation style was very engaging. He really talked directly to the audience and made sure he had them captivated in his talk. He gave examples, showed pictures that people could relate to and included some humor that provided some comic relief. Also, he brought along the invention he had come up with and described and showed pictures of it in action. He also made the audience aware that devices like his aren't to be kept from the world, but shared so everyone can experience the greatness of communicated with paralyzed loved ones.
4. What matters in this video is the incredible invention brought into the light by a small team of people that finally allows paralyzed people to communicate for a very small amount of money. This connects to me personally because if I ever has a family member or friend go paralyzed there is now an inexpensive way to be able to communicate with them. This connects to education because it opens a whole new realm for research, which is how to make this product better and more efficient. This connects to the world because for many years people have not been able to communicate with paralyzed people in an efficient way, but now, with the arrival of the EyeWriter, people can finally bridge that gap of communication with paralyzed people.
1. From this video I have taken away the inspiring idea that paralyzed people can finally have a way to communicate with others. Instead of having to spend huge amounts of money on Stephan Hawking's machine that allows paralyzed people to communicate, a group of 'computer geeks' from all over the world have come together to create a device for their friend, Tony, who was paralyzed. This friend is a big-time graffiti artist in the 80's who experienced ALS and is now completely paralyzed except for his eyes, and has been this way for 7 years, stuck in his mind without a body that functions correctly. Mick and his buddies knew Tony was being tortured by not being able to create art. Mick talked to the family of the paralyzed artist, and even though he had no idea how he was going to do it, he was motivated enough to tell Tony's family he would find away for him to communicate and do his art again. Then, after tons of reasearch, collaboration, and hard-work came along the invention that unlocked a locked in artist. A simple pair of sunglasses with LED lights, wires, and a camera from a PS3 turned into an invention that finally allowed paralyzed people to communicate and draw with movements of their eyes. The device was taken to Tony and he drew for the first time, and later sent an email that said he felt like he had been pulled out from underwater because of the EyeWriter. If you see something that is impossible, make it possible.
2. The speaker was very effective in his speaking techniques. He spoke clearly and directly to the audience and quickly got them hooked in his presentation. He told a story around his slides and spoke smoothly. He kept all his ideas together and used hand movements to clarify each of the inspiring ideas he vocalized.
3. Mick's presentation style was very engaging. He really talked directly to the audience and made sure he had them captivated in his talk. He gave examples, showed pictures that people could relate to and included some humor that provided some comic relief. Also, he brought along the invention he had come up with and described and showed pictures of it in action. He also made the audience aware that devices like his aren't to be kept from the world, but shared so everyone can experience the greatness of communicated with paralyzed loved ones.
4. What matters in this video is the incredible invention brought into the light by a small team of people that finally allows paralyzed people to communicate for a very small amount of money. This connects to me personally because if I ever has a family member or friend go paralyzed there is now an inexpensive way to be able to communicate with them. This connects to education because it opens a whole new realm for research, which is how to make this product better and more efficient. This connects to the world because for many years people have not been able to communicate with paralyzed people in an efficient way, but now, with the arrival of the EyeWriter, people can finally bridge that gap of communication with paralyzed people.
TED Talk Response #6
TED Talk by Dave Eggers
1. One-on-one time is needed for students who are struggling, but teachers can't spend that time with students, So society needs a way to help these kids by providing that one-on-one time they need. To help address this issue, Dave Eggers and his friends came up with the idea to combine their writing center with a tutoring center. In the process they discovered that rrust gaps are important to notice and address. Their original approach (a board that said 'free tutoring') did not go down very well in the neighborhood and they had no students coming in. After adjusting their tactic, the idea took off. The main focus of this tutoring was to help children raise their grades through one-on-one attention. Their facility focused on not sterotyping their program by calling it somewhere where "kids who need help" go, but by characterizing it by the one-on-one oppurtinities it provides. They enjoy having everyone work together. Interns and students working side-by-side, shoulder-to-shoulder. Homework efficiency increases with the one-on-one attention, giving students more time to do their own thing in the evenings. An idea was developed that after writing at a high level, students will not reaturn to their old ways of writing. Meshing together creative fun, humor, tutoring and one-on-one attention creates positive results in students. Children blossom through writing and attention.
2. His speaking is not very good. He is nervous and choppy and says "Uhh" or "Um" a lot. He strays off his topic a lot and speaks very quickly, so it is hard to understand him. He used a few words and phrases like 'transformative' and 'one-on-one attention', over and over again and kind of wore them out in the end.
3. The speaker's presentation style is pretty random. He skips around from idea to idea and retouches on many concepts over and over. He also shows many personal pictures of his experiences, which can help the audience get a first hand look at what he is doing.
4. What matters in this video is the combining of creativity, learning, and one-on-one time with students and what effects it has on the world around us. It connects to me personally because it can possibly change the way english is taught in school, with more one-on-one time. It connects to education in this same way. If it is proven that one-on-one time increases a student's grade, then more options for this type of teaching may be included in education systems. This idea relates to Daniel Pink's book, especially the chapter Symphony, where two ideas come together and work in harmony. In this case, it's creativity and one-on-one time. This effects the world because it exposed an effective way to help students succeed.
1. One-on-one time is needed for students who are struggling, but teachers can't spend that time with students, So society needs a way to help these kids by providing that one-on-one time they need. To help address this issue, Dave Eggers and his friends came up with the idea to combine their writing center with a tutoring center. In the process they discovered that rrust gaps are important to notice and address. Their original approach (a board that said 'free tutoring') did not go down very well in the neighborhood and they had no students coming in. After adjusting their tactic, the idea took off. The main focus of this tutoring was to help children raise their grades through one-on-one attention. Their facility focused on not sterotyping their program by calling it somewhere where "kids who need help" go, but by characterizing it by the one-on-one oppurtinities it provides. They enjoy having everyone work together. Interns and students working side-by-side, shoulder-to-shoulder. Homework efficiency increases with the one-on-one attention, giving students more time to do their own thing in the evenings. An idea was developed that after writing at a high level, students will not reaturn to their old ways of writing. Meshing together creative fun, humor, tutoring and one-on-one attention creates positive results in students. Children blossom through writing and attention.
2. His speaking is not very good. He is nervous and choppy and says "Uhh" or "Um" a lot. He strays off his topic a lot and speaks very quickly, so it is hard to understand him. He used a few words and phrases like 'transformative' and 'one-on-one attention', over and over again and kind of wore them out in the end.
3. The speaker's presentation style is pretty random. He skips around from idea to idea and retouches on many concepts over and over. He also shows many personal pictures of his experiences, which can help the audience get a first hand look at what he is doing.
4. What matters in this video is the combining of creativity, learning, and one-on-one time with students and what effects it has on the world around us. It connects to me personally because it can possibly change the way english is taught in school, with more one-on-one time. It connects to education in this same way. If it is proven that one-on-one time increases a student's grade, then more options for this type of teaching may be included in education systems. This idea relates to Daniel Pink's book, especially the chapter Symphony, where two ideas come together and work in harmony. In this case, it's creativity and one-on-one time. This effects the world because it exposed an effective way to help students succeed.
Thursday, April 28, 2011
TED Talk Response #5
TED Talk by Jane Chen
1. I took away many heart-warming and frustrating ideas from this video. Higher class people tend to not realize the problems in lower class countries. One major problem is lower class women giving birth to premature babies and not being able to keep them alive because they have to access to an incubator to keep the baby warm and help it develop properly. When premature babies are born, they have no way of regulating their own body temperature. 20 million premature babies are born each year and at least 4 million die. However, those who survive grow up to have serious health problems due to improper development during their early life. Many of these problems could be fixed if the babies could be kept warm. This is usually done through an incubator. But they cost up to $20,000, so they will not be available in rural areas in developing countries. Because of this, parents resort to unsafe and ineffective methods to keep them warm, showing their desperateness. Because of these problems, a solution needed to be found. The solution is a seamless, waterproof, sleeping bag looking device that you put the baby in. In the back there is a bag of wax-like substance that melts at human body temperature and will stay warm for 4-6 hours. You simply melt the wax, put in into the sleeping bag, and keep your baby warm. This device is called the Warm Embrace. Because of concerns about premature babies in third world countries, people have reached out to help them. This really inspires me. I'm amazed that these people can create such a live-saving device that is effective, portable, and affordable, and will make a huge difference in the lives of premature babies in third world countries.
2. The speaker has a very effective speaking technique. She spoke in a soft and concerned voice that really plucked some strings in my heart and the hearts of the audience members. She spoke very directly to the people listening to her, as if she was having a private conversation with each member of the audience. The way she spoke made it easy to listen to her and take her point to heart.
3. The speaker also had a very interesting presentation style. She started off by circling around the problem she wanted to discuss, then she dove right in and explained the problem, the process, and the solution and backed it up with hard facts and statistics. She also engages the audience in the presentation. When she told the people in the crowd to close their eyes and hold out their hands, I did it too. She used situations that people in the audience could connect to so that they would take to heart the issues premature babies in third world countries experience.
4. What matters in this video is the amazing persistence of Jane Chen and her team that designed a living saving device, the Warm Embrace. Because of the large costs of an incubator, premature babies born in third world countries are not provided the means they need to survive. This video connects to me because it inspires me to know that people are reaching out in many ways to families living in lower-class conditions and makes me want to do the same. This invention connects to education because it shows that a great invention doesn't have to be a large, expensive, complex device, it can be small and simple, but very effective. This connects to the world because it will save many lives of the premature babies living in third world countries.
1. I took away many heart-warming and frustrating ideas from this video. Higher class people tend to not realize the problems in lower class countries. One major problem is lower class women giving birth to premature babies and not being able to keep them alive because they have to access to an incubator to keep the baby warm and help it develop properly. When premature babies are born, they have no way of regulating their own body temperature. 20 million premature babies are born each year and at least 4 million die. However, those who survive grow up to have serious health problems due to improper development during their early life. Many of these problems could be fixed if the babies could be kept warm. This is usually done through an incubator. But they cost up to $20,000, so they will not be available in rural areas in developing countries. Because of this, parents resort to unsafe and ineffective methods to keep them warm, showing their desperateness. Because of these problems, a solution needed to be found. The solution is a seamless, waterproof, sleeping bag looking device that you put the baby in. In the back there is a bag of wax-like substance that melts at human body temperature and will stay warm for 4-6 hours. You simply melt the wax, put in into the sleeping bag, and keep your baby warm. This device is called the Warm Embrace. Because of concerns about premature babies in third world countries, people have reached out to help them. This really inspires me. I'm amazed that these people can create such a live-saving device that is effective, portable, and affordable, and will make a huge difference in the lives of premature babies in third world countries.
2. The speaker has a very effective speaking technique. She spoke in a soft and concerned voice that really plucked some strings in my heart and the hearts of the audience members. She spoke very directly to the people listening to her, as if she was having a private conversation with each member of the audience. The way she spoke made it easy to listen to her and take her point to heart.
3. The speaker also had a very interesting presentation style. She started off by circling around the problem she wanted to discuss, then she dove right in and explained the problem, the process, and the solution and backed it up with hard facts and statistics. She also engages the audience in the presentation. When she told the people in the crowd to close their eyes and hold out their hands, I did it too. She used situations that people in the audience could connect to so that they would take to heart the issues premature babies in third world countries experience.
4. What matters in this video is the amazing persistence of Jane Chen and her team that designed a living saving device, the Warm Embrace. Because of the large costs of an incubator, premature babies born in third world countries are not provided the means they need to survive. This video connects to me because it inspires me to know that people are reaching out in many ways to families living in lower-class conditions and makes me want to do the same. This invention connects to education because it shows that a great invention doesn't have to be a large, expensive, complex device, it can be small and simple, but very effective. This connects to the world because it will save many lives of the premature babies living in third world countries.
Friday, April 22, 2011
TED Talk Response #4
TED Talk by Clay Shirky
1. Making crisis mapping public. Cognitive surplus. The ability of the world's population to volunteer and come together on shared and possibly world wide projects. People have free time, media tools, modivation and technology to use to come together to help. Which makes me wonder, what kind of world projects have been most effective through using these things? Media landscape is expanding. Any creative act should be put out into the world because it can be improved and redone and expanded on. He brought up "LOL Cats" and I was confused to how this connected to his presentation. Freedom to experiment is important in society. Our society should be design for generosity. Cognitive surplus and different motivation designs. Culture that is broken stays broken. Material with communal value is created by people for each other that should be shared between people. Material with civic value is created by participants, but enjoyed by people for a whole and is used to make life better for everyone in the society that enjoys it. This partially explains why he brough up the "LOL Cats", but I'm still confused why he used that example. What other kinds of things are considered to have civic value? People have around a trillion hours of extra time each year that can be put toward working together and helping. Supporting cognitive surplus can lead to more civic value. I think that the free time that the world has can be put to use. Collaberation and talents can be put together to make a difference.
2. The presenter's speaking techniques were not very effective. He talked very quickly and jumbled words together often. He was hard to follow and could have spoken in a more interesting tone of voice.
3. The speaker's presentation style was very informative and straightforward, however he didn't really connect to people. He expressed his opinions and talked to hard facts, which got his point across, but not in a very interesting or engaging way. He also was very scatterbrained in his presentation style. He would bring up an idea, not complete it, then stray away to another idea, and without completeing it, return to his first unfinished idea. This unorganized presenting made me think that he may not be the right person for this presentation because he was talking about how organizing people together can help make a difference in the world. An unorganized speaker talking about an idea that requires organization... huh.
4. This idea is important because it is a way for people to use their time and talents to come together and make a difference in this world. This connects to me personally because I know as a young American, I can join together with people and make a difference. This connects to education because this can be related to our Warrior Week. We came together as a school to collect money and make a difference in cancer patient's lives. This connects to the world because if we use the cognitive surplus we have as a whole world population, we can seriously change the world for everyone.
1. Making crisis mapping public. Cognitive surplus. The ability of the world's population to volunteer and come together on shared and possibly world wide projects. People have free time, media tools, modivation and technology to use to come together to help. Which makes me wonder, what kind of world projects have been most effective through using these things? Media landscape is expanding. Any creative act should be put out into the world because it can be improved and redone and expanded on. He brought up "LOL Cats" and I was confused to how this connected to his presentation. Freedom to experiment is important in society. Our society should be design for generosity. Cognitive surplus and different motivation designs. Culture that is broken stays broken. Material with communal value is created by people for each other that should be shared between people. Material with civic value is created by participants, but enjoyed by people for a whole and is used to make life better for everyone in the society that enjoys it. This partially explains why he brough up the "LOL Cats", but I'm still confused why he used that example. What other kinds of things are considered to have civic value? People have around a trillion hours of extra time each year that can be put toward working together and helping. Supporting cognitive surplus can lead to more civic value. I think that the free time that the world has can be put to use. Collaberation and talents can be put together to make a difference.
2. The presenter's speaking techniques were not very effective. He talked very quickly and jumbled words together often. He was hard to follow and could have spoken in a more interesting tone of voice.
3. The speaker's presentation style was very informative and straightforward, however he didn't really connect to people. He expressed his opinions and talked to hard facts, which got his point across, but not in a very interesting or engaging way. He also was very scatterbrained in his presentation style. He would bring up an idea, not complete it, then stray away to another idea, and without completeing it, return to his first unfinished idea. This unorganized presenting made me think that he may not be the right person for this presentation because he was talking about how organizing people together can help make a difference in the world. An unorganized speaker talking about an idea that requires organization... huh.
4. This idea is important because it is a way for people to use their time and talents to come together and make a difference in this world. This connects to me personally because I know as a young American, I can join together with people and make a difference. This connects to education because this can be related to our Warrior Week. We came together as a school to collect money and make a difference in cancer patient's lives. This connects to the world because if we use the cognitive surplus we have as a whole world population, we can seriously change the world for everyone.
Tuesday, April 19, 2011
TED Talk Response #3
TED Talk by Daniel Pink
1. There is great power in inscentives. Motivation is strong. The mechanistic "carrot and stick" worked well for simple problems with sets of rules, but when the problem gets harder and more complicated, rewards will narrow your view and it will be easier to solve those problems without a motivational rewards. Creative thinking is important for future jobs. For simple tasks, rewards increase performance. For hard, cognitive tasks, large rewards decrease performance. Mastry is the desire to get better and better. Purpose is the desire to be part of something larger than yourself. These are important building blocks for new kinds of business. Worker productivity will increase when people are not forced into doing things in a certain way, but are given choices, flexibility and the opportunity to be creative. There is a mismatch between what science knows and what business does. If-then rewards and dicipline systems destroy creativity.
2. His speaking technique is very direct and interesting. His voice changes and keeps the audience interested. He speaks louder to emphasize certain points, and quieter when he's trying to make a longer point, so the audience finds more pleasure in listening to his voice for an extended period of time.
3. His presentation style was very loud and interactive. He included many pictures and questions to keep the audience hooked. Also, he included well done research to back up his points.
4. What matters in that video is that motivation should be changed in order for people to be more productive. This connects to me personally because it could possibly change the way students are being taught in schools. This connects to education because this new form of motivation could be used later as a way to teach students in a more creative way. This connects to the world because it would effect the way business is run by including more creative options for working through problems and tasks.
1. There is great power in inscentives. Motivation is strong. The mechanistic "carrot and stick" worked well for simple problems with sets of rules, but when the problem gets harder and more complicated, rewards will narrow your view and it will be easier to solve those problems without a motivational rewards. Creative thinking is important for future jobs. For simple tasks, rewards increase performance. For hard, cognitive tasks, large rewards decrease performance. Mastry is the desire to get better and better. Purpose is the desire to be part of something larger than yourself. These are important building blocks for new kinds of business. Worker productivity will increase when people are not forced into doing things in a certain way, but are given choices, flexibility and the opportunity to be creative. There is a mismatch between what science knows and what business does. If-then rewards and dicipline systems destroy creativity.
2. His speaking technique is very direct and interesting. His voice changes and keeps the audience interested. He speaks louder to emphasize certain points, and quieter when he's trying to make a longer point, so the audience finds more pleasure in listening to his voice for an extended period of time.
3. His presentation style was very loud and interactive. He included many pictures and questions to keep the audience hooked. Also, he included well done research to back up his points.
4. What matters in that video is that motivation should be changed in order for people to be more productive. This connects to me personally because it could possibly change the way students are being taught in schools. This connects to education because this new form of motivation could be used later as a way to teach students in a more creative way. This connects to the world because it would effect the way business is run by including more creative options for working through problems and tasks.
Monday, April 18, 2011
TED Talk Response #2
TED Talk by Gever Tulley
1. We live in a world where there are endless child safety regulations. There is no limit on how crazy child safety regulations can get. Everything sharper than a golf ball needs a warning printed on it to keep the children safe. Because we are preventing children from coming in contact with anything dangerous, the first time they encounter something like that, they will most likely hurt themselves with it. When the "safety zone" gets smaller, we cut children off from learning about how to deal with the world around them. Even though we try to protect them, they will still figure out how to do something dangerous. Playing with fire, owning a pocket knife, throwing a spear and deconstruction of appliances can help us raise our kids to be creative, confident, and in control of their environment. Each of things things stimulate the brain in different ways and can help children learn.
2. In this TED talk, the speaker did not have great speaking technique. He stuttered a little and his speaking was not very smooth. However, it was effective because he got a lot of valuable information across to the audience in a short amount of time.
3. Tulley's presentation style was very straightforward and easy to relate to. He included pictures of small children doing things he suggests we let them do, as well as familiar warning signs and things parents can relate to.
4. What matters from this TED talk is the idea that we should not restrain our children from the world around us, because when they are allowed to explore and discover through things we may consider "dangerous", they develop a sense of confidence and security when they are out in the world. This connects to me personally because I've always been allowed to experiment with things that could be called dangerous, and as a result I have a better understanding of what's really dangerous in this world and why. It connects to education because in modern days our education is very safe and steers children clear of dangerous things, but if we let them experience more not totally safe situations, they could be better prepared to face the outside world on their own. This talk connects to the world because we do have an ample amount of unnecessary child safety regulations that could be loosened up so our children could learn and explore real life situations, not just things inside their "safety-zones".
1. We live in a world where there are endless child safety regulations. There is no limit on how crazy child safety regulations can get. Everything sharper than a golf ball needs a warning printed on it to keep the children safe. Because we are preventing children from coming in contact with anything dangerous, the first time they encounter something like that, they will most likely hurt themselves with it. When the "safety zone" gets smaller, we cut children off from learning about how to deal with the world around them. Even though we try to protect them, they will still figure out how to do something dangerous. Playing with fire, owning a pocket knife, throwing a spear and deconstruction of appliances can help us raise our kids to be creative, confident, and in control of their environment. Each of things things stimulate the brain in different ways and can help children learn.
2. In this TED talk, the speaker did not have great speaking technique. He stuttered a little and his speaking was not very smooth. However, it was effective because he got a lot of valuable information across to the audience in a short amount of time.
3. Tulley's presentation style was very straightforward and easy to relate to. He included pictures of small children doing things he suggests we let them do, as well as familiar warning signs and things parents can relate to.
4. What matters from this TED talk is the idea that we should not restrain our children from the world around us, because when they are allowed to explore and discover through things we may consider "dangerous", they develop a sense of confidence and security when they are out in the world. This connects to me personally because I've always been allowed to experiment with things that could be called dangerous, and as a result I have a better understanding of what's really dangerous in this world and why. It connects to education because in modern days our education is very safe and steers children clear of dangerous things, but if we let them experience more not totally safe situations, they could be better prepared to face the outside world on their own. This talk connects to the world because we do have an ample amount of unnecessary child safety regulations that could be loosened up so our children could learn and explore real life situations, not just things inside their "safety-zones".
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)